So what I'm saying is my internal assessment of what happens IS what happens, in the broadest of terms. I've never found another person so interested in their own brain's function as I am but I know they exist. That's the truth part of the title.
The untruth part is that when I write memoir pieces like the one mentioned, I am usually aware of occasions when I embellish, distort, omit or otherwise play fast and loose with facts. I did it with that piece, just slightly for the sake of literary balance and because some bits weren't clear in my memory. I do it with most memory pieces. I don't know if all writers of memoir [or tiny bits and pieces which is all I write] consciously distort as I do. Probably most do. And others probably misremember. I know historians love going to the "source" to get the "real story" of what happened when, say a President met with an advisor. Always question. Always, always question everyone's version of history. No two people will remember the same incident the same way -- as lawyers and judges and psychiatrists all know. I'll say mea culpa. Lots of people won't.
1 comment:
I'm guessing that most people distort memoirs, consciously or unconsciously. What the heck, they're your memories and if they tell better with a little tweaking, why not? And our memory plays tricks on us, sometimes we remember something a certain way and it wasn't like that at all! Somewhere along the way, the memory got tweaked, or maybe it's not a real memory at all, it's something we heard that we just adopted as our own. There are times, like in a courtroom or on a legal document, when factual truth really matters. There are other times when truth is bigger than facts.
Post a Comment