![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj203XWsoR6VI4jSZi8iO6sEb_oRwxoAhs0U-PArm800vsfKpcCV_waG6vxcIJ2ZzgtioXe_xgVjG3h9Is4PW_uU0S5Q7y8VPBh_TxMsH9Ik2Hmzm-LHG8AvA0wbPG-WIt54oSDOsQG1Zo/s320/images-1.jpg)
This truth or myth, whichever it actually is, has definitely invaded the world of senior writing opportunities. I have recently found two places that solicit stories by and for people over 60 -- BUT one wants pieces no more than 1000 words and the other limits it to 750 words. Why? I don't believe it is for the readers' sake; I think it is laziness on the editors' part. I love words, I love stories, I love full and interesting characterization, vivid description, complex stories. None of those attributes are possible in 1000 words. The so-called "flash fiction" that some serious literary journals solicit is utterly boring except in the cases where it is actually a prose poem with the density of lanugage and meaning of a poem, not a short story. And very few people are capable of writing truly fine prose poems, just as very few poets can write fine haiku.
If I write a 2500 word short story [and I generally do] I would eviscerate the characters, turn settings into stereotype and washout most of the vivid details. I don't want to read or write that kind of short story. Most of mine will remain on my hard drive with hard copies shared with only a very close friends.
2 comments:
I agree! I like long stories -- no Reader's Digest pablum for me.
I love words and stories too. Maybe the reason for the 1000 word limit is a diminished (in more than one way) demographic audience.
Post a Comment